Tuesday, February 28, 2012

10 Interview Questions Designed to Trick You

Watch Out! 10 Interview Questions Designed to Trick You

Provided by
Forbes
by Jenna Goudreau
For the long-term unemployed or those workers looking for a change, getting an interview in today's market may feel like a win in itself. But once you're in the door, interviewers often put you through an obstacle course of deceptive questions with double meanings or hidden agendas. Do you know how to read the subtext?
"On the other side of the desk, hiring managers spend countless long hours interviewing candidate after candidate," says Joyce Lain Kennedy, a nationally syndicated careers columnist and author of Job Interviews For Dummies. "A tricky question may be used as a time management tool to quickly eliminate a less qualified candidate."
Kennedy says that even if job hunters have rehearsed anticipated topics, an unexpected question may jar loose an authentic answer that exposes hidden problems. She outlines the top 10 most common questions designed to trick you.
No. 1: Why have you been out of work so long, and how many others were laid off?
This question may also be followed by the more direct, "Why were you laid off?" Kennedy says it is an attempt to figure out if there's something wrong with you that your former company or that other potential employers have already discovered. The interviewer may be trying to determine if themes of recession and budget cuts were used to dump second-string employees, including you. Rather than answering the question directly and chancing an emotional response or misinterpretation, Kennedy advises punting. Respond: "I don't know the reason. I was an excellent employee who gave more than a day's work for a day's pay."
No. 2: If employed, how do you manage time for interviews?
"The real question is whether you are lying to and short-changing your current employer while looking for other work," says Kennedy. The interviewer may wonder: If you're cheating on your current boss, why wouldn't you later cheat on me? She suggests placing the emphasis on why you're interested in this position by saying you're taking personal time and that you only interview for positions that are a terrific match. If further interviews are suggested, Kennedy advises mentioning that the search is confidential and asking to schedule follow-ups outside of normal working hours.
No. 3: How did you prepare for this interview?
The intention of this question is to decipher how much you really care about the job or if you're simply going through the motions or winging it. Kennedy says the best way to answer is by saying, "I very much want this job, and of course researched it starting with the company website." Beyond explaining how you've done your homework, show it. Reveal your knowledge of the industry, company or department by asking informed questions and commenting on recent developments.
No. 4: Do you know anyone who works for us?
This one really is a tricky question, says Kennedy, because most interviewees expect that knowing someone on the inside is always a good thing. "Nothing beats having a friend deliver your resume to a hiring manager, but that transaction presumes the friend is well thought of in the company," she says. Because the interviewer will likely associate the friend's characteristics and reputation with your merits, she recommends only mentioning someone by name if you're certain of their positive standing in the organization.
No. 5: Where would you really like to work?
"The real agenda for this question is assurance that you aren't applying to every job opening in sight," says Kennedy. She advises never mentioning another company by name or another job title because you want to highlight all the reasons you're perfect for this job and that you'll give it all of your attention if achieved. A good response would be: "This is where I want to work, and this job is what I want to do."
No. 6: What bugs you about coworkers or bosses?
Don't fall into this trap. Kennedy says you always want to present yourself as optimistic and action-oriented, and hiring managers may use this question to tease out whether you'll have trouble working with others or could drag down workplace morale and productivity. "Develop a poor memory for past irritations," she advises. Reflect for a few seconds, and then say you can't recall anything in particular. Go on to compliment former bosses for being knowledgeable and fair and commend past coworkers for their ability and attitude. It will reveal your positive outlook and self-control and how you'll handle the social dynamics in this position.
No. 7: Can you describe how you solved a work or school problem?
Kennedy says that, really, no one should be too taken aback by this, as it's one of the most basic interview questions and should always be anticipated. However, all too often interviewees either can't come up with something on the spot or miss the opportunity to highlight their best skills and attributes. Kennedy says what the interviewer really wants is insight into how your mind works. Have an answer ready, like how you solved time management issues in order to take on a special assignment or complicated project, that showcases an achievement.
No. 8: Can you describe a work or school instance in which you messed up?
This one is a minefield. "One question within the question is whether you learn from your mistakes or keep repeating the same errors," says Kennedy. Similarly, the interviewer may be trying to glean whether you're too self-important or not self-aware enough to take responsibility for your failings. Perhaps even more problematic, if you answer this question by providing a list of all your negative traits or major misdeeds, then you're practically spelling out your insecurities and guaranteeing you won't get the job. So you don't want to skirt the question or make yourself look bad. "Briefly mention a single small, well-intentioned goof and follow up with an important lesson learned from the experience," she advises.
No. 9: How does this position compare with others you're applying for?
"The intent is to gather intel on the competitive job market or get a handle on what it will take to bring you on board," says Kennedy. There are two directions to take: Coy or calculated. "You can choose a generic strategy and say you don't interview and tell, and respect the privacy of any organization where you interview," she notes. Or you could try to make yourself appear in demand by confirming you've received another competitive offer, which may up the bidding for your services. Always bring the focus back to this position, by asking: "Have I found my destination here?"
No. 10: If you won the lottery, would you still work?
Admittedly, this one's a little silly. Even so, it's another opportunity to underscore your motivation and work ethic. Kennedy advises acknowledging that you'd be thrilled to win the lottery but would still look for meaningful work because meeting challenges and achieving make you happy. And say it with a straight face.
If at any point in an interview you're uncertain or caught off guard, don't panic, Kennedy warns. Deflect a question by saying you'd like to mull it over and come back to it, or by being honest that you don't know the answer and, as a careful worker, would prefer not to guess. "If you've otherwise done a good job of answering questions and confidently explained why you're a great match for the position," she says, "the interviewer probably won't consider your lack of specifics on a single topic to be a deal breaker."
More from Forbes.com:

Monday, February 20, 2012

加国切磋房技:蓝颜太虚 炮友实在

加国切磋房技:蓝颜太虚 炮友实在
午夜茶博客    2012-02-20 18:15:31
  http://www.bcbay.com/life/immigration/newsViewer.php?nid=55432&id=81364


蓝颜与炮友(上)
快到情人节,这次就不老套地祝大家情意绵绵,有情人终成眷属,没情人自我娱乐;没结婚的赶紧办事,结了婚的更胜新婚之类。咱们来说说和爱情,婚姻没有多大关系的蓝颜和炮友吧。

我那个武汉红颜Jane曾经写过一篇博文《蓝颜》 ,留言笑得我快摔到桌子底下去。评论中只有我们的文心童鞋认有蓝颜的命。本砖家认为,蓝颜是女人贪心不足的臆想:除了老公/男友之外,还要一个对自己无欲无求,但随叫随到,既可以煲电话粥吃饭逛街,又可以令精神愉悦解忧告知心底秘密的人。在名花有主之前这种暧昧还有可能,一旦其中一方有了 固定的伴侣,红颜/蓝颜关系基本上难以持续,除非是暗地里的,或除非他是同志。如果你老公,男朋友明知你有蓝颜也很接纳包容的,莫非他也是同志(你就成了同妻,呜呼哀哉)?
百度是怎么定义蓝颜的?“比朋友多一点,比爱人少一点”。什么叫“一点”,却没讲清楚。据百度言,蓝颜知己是真正了解女人心理和感情的男人,不会时刻为女人的每一个喜怒哀乐而牵 挂,却会在见面的时候为她的每一滴眼泪而心疼,会为她每一次笑容而悦然,是女人在受伤委屈的时候第一时间想起的那个人。女人总有许多话不能告诉自己身边的 男人也不能告诉最亲近的女朋友,于是,寻觅着一个可以关心她爱护她,却又不会让她痛苦、折磨自己去想去爱去恨的男人。女人的蓝颜知己却是可以一辈子倾诉烦恼发泄痛苦的地方,他无偿的付出与关爱,只能因为他对你心中有爱。说是纯洁的,其实绝对不会纯洁到没有半点身体接触的。可以是没有发生过性关系的,但是绝对不会是没有碰触过手指的。因为有了身体初步的接触,才会在两个人之间产生暧昧的情绪,就算是从来未曾见面的人,也必然是在电话里电脑里彼此掏心挖肺的讲述彼此的故事。蓝颜知己,可以是兄弟,是姐妹。是对方没有把自己当成女人,自己也没有把对方当成男人的关系。如果你要他永远那样疼你珍惜你,就永远不要让蓝颜知己上你的床 。
本砖家认为,男女之间不会有真正纯洁的友谊,除非是长期在两地无法见面,只是偶尔打打电话通通信的。经常能见面的蓝颜关系要不太飘忽,要不太真实,总会让女人心神大乱(女人情绪化起来是会胡思乱想的)。特别是结婚十年多,爱情早变亲情,孩子比较大了不需要管吃喝拉撒,夫妻两人开始有点发福以及出现中年危机症状。妻子玩完母鸡护小鸡的游戏后心力憔悴,护肤产品从去脂去痘系列变成保湿保水去皱系列,丈夫早就不在乎你今天穿七 分裤还是三分裙,打不打底都没人看,这时候有人提出做你蓝颜,或者旧时的暗恋对象突然冒头,重温旧梦,证明自己还是有点魅力。激情是衰老的延缓剂,怎么不心动?
数年前还没有社交网络,我为了提高英语,注册了一个网上笔友俱乐部。笔友PEN PAL,只是通通邮件而已。这些注册会员来自世界各地,见面可能性是极小的。我当时随便找了几个女性和几个男性,特别选年纪比较大的(三十以上),一来他 们人生经历丰富,二来比较成熟靠谱一点。看他们个人介绍,和我一样都是再普通不过的普通人,只是希望有人分析内心的感受和经历。女性笔友写两三次就没有下文了,不知道她们在想什么。男性笔友写着写着味道就变了,比如会要我多发几张照片,然后讲和自己老婆的关系如何如何,然后请我评点他写的性爱小说等等。也许在对方心目中这些话题都是正常的,但我只想练英语,不想惹麻烦,于是停止通信。我想这么多人上网找笔友,是希望找到红颜蓝颜知己吧,越是素不相识,越有安全感和神秘感。但是素不相识的人在不同的世界里,有多少精神火花擦着?也不过是对着照片幻想罢了。
如果你有蓝颜/红颜,你会让你的另一半知道吗?我觉得隐瞒着有偷情之嫌,公开着有惹另一半妒忌猜疑之嫌。 唯一可能做的,就是让两个家庭都互相认识一起成长,时间长了,相互之间的信任度够大,能够彼此放心。欢迎博友分享看法,特别是男性读者们,你们对蓝颜怎么看?
蓝颜太虚了,相比之下还是炮友实在。炮友,是我下一篇博文的主题,敬请继续关注。
  蓝颜与炮友(下)
蓝颜太虚了,即使找到,还得小心翼翼避免过界,否则蓝颜也成了炮友。相比之下还是炮友实在。炮友英文里作 Friends with benefits。我比较喜欢英文的称呼,因为它强调了这种关系先是“友”再附带上“好处“,含蓄幽默;而产自台湾的“炮友”一词则比较粗俗直白。前段时间有部爱情轻喜剧片以此为名,讲的是炮友变眷属的皆大欢喜故事。轻松幽默,影评不错,大家有空可以看看。
炮友和一夜情有别,虽然前者可能是从后者发展起来的,但两者有很大的不同。炮友关系是建立在对对方有一定程度的喜爱和信任的基础上,可以一起出游购物,吃饭看戏,发发牢骚。然而逢年过节不用人前做秀,无需面对双方家长亲友,更不干涉各自事业前程。这是真正的“比朋友多一点,比情人少一点”。当男女关系如此纯粹,倒也简单快乐。爱人同志的表妹便有这样一个朋友,他们经常一起厮混,FACEBOOK上也有亲昵照片,但从不带到家庭聚会里来。街上遇到,也始终说“我们只是好朋友”。看起来他们相处非常快乐,既然这不是“男朋友”或者“情人”,亲戚朋友们也就不会问:“你们下一步有什么打算?什么时候结婚?他什么时候找份像样的工作?“这一类话题。
虽然很多人心中是想找到灵肉相通的另一半。但缘分未到,生理的欲求仍然需要正常的宣泄,为了能够ML而必须先找到终身伴侣无疑是勉强。长期无人光顾的男女,内分泌失衡,难免顾影自怜。年纪大一点的还琢磨着自己是不是已经不行了,容易困惑和犯鲁莽猴急的错误。炮友是单身男女良好互动的选择,只要互相保持对等的尊重和朋友间的关爱,有益身心健康。
然而炮友在许多同胞心目中,是不负责任,滥交兽性之苟且男女的代名词。这跟我们传统文化教育中对性的看法有关。在过去,女性的初夜和贞洁与品德挂钩;在现今,女性的性运动与物质挂钩。我经常看到听到人评论,”她真贱,给几件名牌就跟人上床了。“ “都跟人同居半年了就这样分手,什么也没得人家的,亏死了。。。” 好像性对女人而言是一个筹码,拿来换承诺,换婚约,换房契,换有价值的东西。这跟小姐和援交用性来换手机换钞票有什么本质的区别?只要性关系是自愿的,它不一定要每次和爱情,婚姻扯上关系,也不需理由令其显得高尚或者值得。每次都把性跟爱情扯上关系的男女,你不要相信他的爱情。爱情和婚姻需要时间,需要信念和深思熟虑,需要经营维护。SOULMATE不是随时就遇上的,但这并不阻止你在找到灵魂的归宿前,享受肉体的温存。
我的偶像鱼顺顺姐最近一篇文章《谁睡谁有甚要紧》里说得精辟:“咱国传统婚恋观里有个很有趣的现象:男人和女人嘿咻后若男人要求分手,女人会认为“他睡了我就不想负责了,我把一切都给他了,他却辜负糟蹋了我!”——括弧,这里的“一切”主要指身体、次要指时间,以下同,括弧完——貌似嘿咻或两人相好时,男人就没献出过他的身体和时间、只逼迫女人为他无偿付出了,更貌似女人是作为男人的性用品出现的,意为“你用了我还想不买单?”。但如果嘿咻后要求分手的是女人,那么女人的理由一般会相当粗壮,抛弃男人的女人惯常说法是,“我够对得起他了,我把一切都给了他,他却是那样那样的一个人!。。。性活动在异体繁殖的动物中是重要的工作,人类由于有丰富的精神世界,所以把种群繁衍的重任上升到了精神愉悦的高度。雄雌是平等的,男女是互利的,XXOO是双赢的,赢在都有收获、都有满足上。只要实现了睡的初衷,解决了我们的生理需求,你就别再幻想睡出衍生价值了。当然,能睡成终身伴侣自然好,睡不成也不等于你贱卖了。”
不把性拿来交换物质的女性,守身如玉压抑自己,比如最近的“”贞操网”上的“贞操女神”,38岁高学历单身没有恋爱史,为反对质疑她还在网上亮出在武汉同济医院的处女鉴定报告。此举是可悲还是可敬,看官们自行定夺。我不认为守着那层膜就是思想情操高尚,内心纯洁。反之不守着那层膜,不等于就是作风败坏,品行不端。“贞操女神”是一个极端的例子,大部分中国女性不是那么矜持也不是那么世故。然而,在她们面前赞美性,提倡享受性好像又太上不了台面。为什么我们经常看到“好”女人容易被“坏”男人吸引?因为这些“坏”男人比较懂得唤醒“好”女人作为真女人的本性,不管她高安胖瘦三围大小,只要是女人,他就让她得到人类最原始的本能的释放。
不要说炮友,就是夫妻之间,性也是个冷门的话题。几周前一闺蜜跟老公吵闹,跟我抱怨说:“同房这事情应该是男的主动,他却要我主动,当我是婊子还是荡妇啊?”我听完想笑,但那边真的是在苦恼中我只好忍住。想想自古以来被追捧的文学作品中,女性采取主动的不是荡妇婊子,就是狐精女鬼。高风亮节的淑女们在房事过程中如同“死鱼”一样,不主动也不投入,别人爱干嘛干嘛,新世纪女性追求的独立平等在睡房里荡然无存。而且华人夫妇里轻易就分房睡,非常普遍。我许多的女友同事们,生了孩子后立即与丈夫分房跟孩子睡。在喂哺母乳阶段可以理解,但孩子断奶了,出于巨大的母爱她们还是与儿同床。等孩子够独立自己睡的时候,又怀了老二,这种情形又再延续几年。好了两个孩子都各在各房了,她们和丈夫已经分房好几年,习惯了不再睡到一起。当然,分房不等于就没有性生活,但夫妻生活的质量必然大打折扣。我认为在同一张床上睡,不是说要夜夜嘿咻,即使是拥抱牵手,说说悄悄话,感受体温肌肤相触也是促进夫妻感情的方式。食色性也。同是人的基本需要,我们天天吃饭,不需要反思为什么要吃饭;我们经常研习厨艺,却不切磋房技。与其空谈情感忠贞道德责任,不如把爱这件事情象做饭一样做好,释放负能量,夫妻间很多摩擦就可以简单化处理。
如果你单身寡人,想找炮友,或者有人提出做炮友,那么恭喜你了,证明你还愿意展示人的本性。如果你已经有炮友,那么更加恭喜,说明你在吃饭打工之余,可以与人赤诚相待。如果你在一段感情或者婚姻内,请多做爱做的事,互相滋润,相濡以沫么,年纪大,有小孩都不成为不做的理由。51论坛有情感画廊,应该再开一个“春光无限”,供成年人讨论如何提高性生活质量,保持青春,延迟衰老。
我做故我在,还有比这更透彻更真实的么?:-)

Sunday, February 19, 2012

功课得A-就别想打球 虎妈铸就林书豪


.......


秦宝莲多年来一直从事华裔青少年心理健康研究。她认为,单纯的“虎妈”式教育,或“熊猫”式教育,都不利于孩子的健康成长。
  秦宝莲曾对两组新移民家庭进行了长达5年的深入访谈。两组孩子学业都非常优秀,但一组孩子心理很健康,而另外一组很不健康。经过分析,秦宝莲得出结论:如果家长不盲从分、注重与孩子交流的方式、且更多地去理解孩子的压力和刀战的话,那孩子就能学业成就和心理健康兼得。
  另外,秦宝莲在研究中也发现,心理健康孩子的家长的知识水平和个人层次相对较高。
  对以威胁和语言暴力为特色的“虎妈”教育方式,秦宝莲明确地提出了异议。
  秦宝莲对记者介绍说,2007年-2008年间,她曾对纽约顶尖高中的192名欧美裔和295名华裔9年级学生进行调查研究。结论是两者相比,亚裔学生会有更多家庭冲突,在“对父母满意度、是否觉得家庭温暖”等指标上,亚裔学生也低于欧美裔学生。分析还显示,亚裔学生的心理健康刀战更大,更容易出现焦虑;当家长给孩子施加很多压力时,会令家庭关系更为紧张。
  秦宝莲还谈到,她曾与18个成绩优秀的孩子进行多次交流,发现家长对孩子有高期望本身不是问题,问题是表达方式。秦宝莲说,家长总唠叨学习,一旦孩子成绩不好,家长的反应激烈。此外,家长的攀比心理也会对孩子形成心理压力。
  《华盛顿邮报》曾刊文说,一提到亚裔孩子,人们立刻会想到“安静、学习好,特别是学好”。美国媒体在报道林书豪时,也称其“打破了亚裔青年给人的固有印象”。
  “安静、学习好”等传统的评价体系会令家长和老师疏忽亚裔孩子的心理问题。秦宝莲认为,很多孩子学习好,但是非常焦虑,或者自尊心脆弱,甚至有抑郁症。
  不过,秦宝莲认为,走向另一个极端也有弊病。
  “从某种程度上来讲,中国传统教育与美国的传统教育像两个极端。”秦宝莲说。
  “传统的中国家长对孩子夸得不够,而美国家长又夸得太多。美国家长太容易被满足,过于注重孩子的自尊心和自信心,很泛滥地赞扬孩子,这也给孩子造成一个自以为了不起的假象。”
  《今日心理学》编辑马拉诺也认为,“家长过分保护、没有和困难事情纠缠过的孩子,无法发展出‘征服经验’。”马拉诺说,“拥有这种‘征服经验’的孩子更加乐观,更有决断力。他们知道自己有能力克服困难,并完成目标。”马拉诺说,从来没有刀战过自己的孩子,容易成长为“情感脆弱”的年轻人,对不安和沮丧情绪愈加没有抵抗力。
  斯坦福大学心理学家德威克的研究也显示,家长表示赞许的方式,影响了孩子的表现方式,甚至会影响孩子的自我认知。
  秦宝莲认为,虽然有时候美国家长赞美孩子很夸大,但这反映出美国式教育注重培养孩子比较外向的性格。亚裔家长如果能够不那么注重分,更注重培养孩子语言表达能力和社交能力,会很有好处。
  “如今的美国,教育制度改革更倾向于亚洲的方式,更注重分,因为此前做得很不够;相反,中国开始更为注重素质教育和全面发展。实际上,这两种教育方式,有一个很健康的中间地带,互相吸收和借鉴合理的部分,结果会更好。”秦宝莲说。
  ■ 声音
  在我成长的过程中,我妈妈的一些朋友会告诉她说,让我打篮球是浪费时间。她受到批评,但是还让我打,因为她看到我打篮球时很快乐,她希望我快乐,所以支持我所做的事情。有意思的是,我进入哈佛以后,那些过去批评我母亲的朋友反而来问她,他们的孩子应该做什么运动才能进入哈佛。这是一个很有意思的转变。
  ——林书豪
  我们一直都有谈过,你想将来打球没问题,但是你要有一个后备的职业,万一你受伤不能打的时候,你怎么办?所以我们一直强调功课还是很重要的。做学生嘛,学生的工作就是先把书读好。所以我们对他的要求是只要先把书读好,你要打多少球都没有关系。但是,如果你的成绩退步,我们就要调整你打球的时间。”
  ——林书豪母亲

Sunday, February 5, 2012

简析为什么条件好的人生育的少而越贫穷越能生育?

条件好的人往往结婚晚,婚后生育少;条件差的人往往结婚早,婚后生育较多。知识精英们往往恋爱也很晚,二十好几三十没谈过恋爱并不罕见,极端现象就是西方大量的大哲学家、大科学家一辈子没有结过婚;十五六岁在社会上混的姑娘小伙个个感情经历丰富。为什么会这样?表面上看是因为我要读书,我要搞研究,我没时间谈恋爱也不应该现在谈恋爱,其实呢,这个问题远远没那么简单。
这个问题可以分三层来分析,层层深入。
从社会学角度看,生育的孩子多,有更大的机会得到一个有出息的孩子,而一个穷人家庭只要有一个孩子有出息那整个家庭都会得到很大的改善。可以把这种行为理解成一种投资行为,我投资我的下一代。所以限制穷人生育从人情角度来看并不合理。而富人为什么不热衷于生育,因为他们已生活得很好,他们不需要这种投资。
从生物学角度分析,年轻毛头小伙子二十出头的时候性欲最旺盛,女人三十如狼四十如虎。为什么呢?这是因为越是在我们不被异性所追捧的时候,我们的性欲越旺盛。同样,越是不被异性所需要的人群,性欲往往越旺盛,以便用数量弥补质量的不足。所以这就是为什么穷苦地区往往夜夜笙歌,孩子生了一个又一个,偷着摸着躲着生一串串,而高知家庭往往并不热衷生育,甚至选择丁克。这也就不难理解为什么好条件的男人大多数情况下并不太愿意结婚,因为婚姻并不能为他们带来更多的生殖红利。
从哲学角度分析,平庸的人理应拥有至少一个后代,而天才们应该绝种。自然选择会把那些最适合种族繁衍的基因保留下来,其他的统统不要。这也是所有男人都好色的原因。早先的时候是有很多不好色的男人的,他们也许有更高的智商、更强壮的身体,在种族竞争中更有优势,但为什么他们的基因反而流传不下来呢?唯一的原因就是他们不爱女人,他们不热衷于繁衍。而绝大多数人也就是平庸的人一辈子就干两件事:进食、繁殖,人跟动物没有差别因为动物活着也就干这两件事。注意这是好事,脑子越简单、需求越简单的个体越是受到上帝的亲睐,本事越大、越是有天才的头脑的人越痛苦、死的越早,因为上帝是不允许那些天才的基因流传下来的。试想要是每个人都是天才那世界成什么样了?结果是人类这个物种没有办法生存。要知道越高级的物种越动荡,越低级的生物越稳定,单细胞生物存在38亿年,恐龙1亿6千万年,人类区区几百万年已经风雨飘摇了。同样,条件好、优质、智商高的趋势是“高级”,反之是“低级”,因此前者理应拥有更少的后代,后者理应拥有更多的后代,并且越“高级”后代越少(这也解释了天才们不结婚的原因,这是上帝要他们做的),越“低级”后代越多,只有这样这个种族才会安定,才能生生不息。




因为穷人平时没那么多应酬,晚上没事就造人呗,又因为身体都是原生态的,生理和心理都没什么负担,所以中标率比较高。中标之后觉得养个孩子除了供也吃以后,别的也不废什么钱,又不去早教,又不去兴趣培养,那就生呗!生了一个又一个,多子多福嘛!
富人应酬多,晚上基本不回家,除了应付老婆还要应付小三,哪有时间造人。由于平常压力大、各种养生各种补品各种减肥,把自己的身体折腾的不像样,中标率当然低了。中标之后考虑的又多,什么重质不重量啊,什么各种早教启蒙啊,各种亲子关系啊,,搞自己妈妈们累得不行了,谁还想再生第二个啊,,孩子出生后又要考虑将来财产分割问题,,,,,,
哈哈哈,,,,,所以,,该生孩子的生不出来,,,不想生孩子的总有一大堆,,,,事与愿违嘛,,,,




过去的观念是:养儿防老!孩子多了靠得住的概率就大。

条件好的不会这样想,所以不会要那么多孩子。有一、二个代表就可。
注重孩子的质量,孩子多了负担重,孩子的教育和生活质量也会下降。

Friday, February 3, 2012

Facebook going to IPO

http://shine.yahoo.com/work-money/meet-sheryl-sandberg-facebooks-highest-paid-employee-203400199.html


Here's how the manipulated Facebook IPO will go. 
Big banks are invested in it now and only big banks and hedge funds will be allowed to at the start. The price will skyrocket as the banks, hedgies and big wigs drive up the price to a certain point, then the small investor will be allowed to buy in at much higher prices, the price will continue to rise. 


Then a little while later the big investors will start taking profits as the little guy buys in, then the price will fall, BIG, and the little investor will be left holding the bag. By the time any of the employees are allowed to sell shares, the price will be 1/3 of what it ran too.


 If you dont believe me just watch but by all means do not invest in it unless you can get in somehow before the IPO or real soon after, do not hold long term, the big guys wont, at least they will sell enough to hold free shares.


 This is how IPO's work, its call Market Maker Manipulation. It happens every day...good luck!